Growing political unrest in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir has brought renewed focus on governance and representation. The PoJK federal interference claim gained attention after a senior legal figure alleged that elected institutions no longer serve the public interest and operate under external influence, raising questions over democratic accountability in the region.
Allegations raise questions over PoJK governance
Political tensions are intensifying in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir as sections of civil society question the effectiveness of elected institutions. Recent protests reflect broader dissatisfaction with governance structures, amid claims that decision-making authority does not rest with local representatives.
Senior lawyer and former Advocate General Sardar Karam Dad Khan has emerged as a prominent voice in the debate. He publicly stated that the region’s legislative framework has drifted away from its original purpose.
Assembly accused of losing public mandate
According to Khan, the PoJK Legislative Assembly no longer represents the will of the people. He argued that the institution has become functionally irrelevant, claiming its actions do not align with public expectations or democratic principles.
Khan alleged that legislative processes now prioritise the protection of select groups rather than addressing everyday concerns. He maintained that public confidence in the assembly has steadily declined, contributing to the present unrest.
PoJK federal interference claim fuels protests
The PoJK federal interference claim centres on the assertion that real authority lies outside the region. Khan alleged that Pakistan’s federal establishment exerts decisive control over policy decisions, limiting the autonomy of local institutions.
He further claimed that negotiations with protest groups were directed externally, undermining the credibility of local leadership. These assertions have resonated with demonstrators demanding greater political ownership and accountability.
Civil society movement, not a sectoral protest
Defending the protests, Khan described the Joint Awami Action Committee as a broad-based civil society platform rather than a group driven by narrow interests. He stated that the movement reflects collective frustration across social groups.
According to his assessment, widespread public participation indicates growing resistance to what protesters view as a governance structure detached from local realities. The demonstrations have remained focused on constitutional demands rather than calls for extra-legal action.
Financial priorities questioned amid unrest
Khan also criticised public spending patterns, arguing that large financial allocations to legislative bodies have failed to translate into meaningful governance outcomes. He alleged that the assembly’s expenditures primarily serve institutional benefits rather than public welfare.
These remarks have intensified debate over transparency and accountability in PoJK’s administrative framework, particularly at a time of economic pressure and political mobilisation.
Constitutional framework cited in defence
Addressing allegations of unrest, Khan asserted that protest actions have remained within constitutional boundaries. He stated that demonstrators have adhered to both Pakistan’s Constitution and PoJK’s local constitutional provisions.
However, he alleged that responses to the movement involved pressure tactics rather than dialogue, further deepening public distrust. These claims have added weight to the broader PoJK federal interference claim circulating in political discourse.
Broader implications for democratic institutions
Observers note that the controversy highlights long-standing concerns about democratic representation in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The allegations underline tensions between elected bodies and federal authority, a recurring issue in regional governance debates.
As protests continue, attention remains on whether institutional reforms or political engagement can address public grievances. The situation underscores the challenge of balancing constitutional governance with demands for greater regional autonomy.
To learn more, follow Shabdsanchi’s social media pages today and stay updated.
- Facebook: shabdsanchi
- Instagram: shabdsanchiofficial
- YouTube: @shabd_sanchi
- Twitter: shabdsanchi
