The digital landscape is buzzing after Galgotias Rep Neha Singh’s “Open To Work” LinkedIn Pic Viral After Robot Row captured public attention. Neha Singh, a senior representative of Galgotias University, found herself at the center of a major controversy during the India AI Impact Summit held at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi. The incident involved the misrepresentation of a robotic exhibit, leading to institutional embarrassment and personal social media scrutiny.
The controversy erupted when Neha Singh, the Head of Department for Communication at Galgotias University, showcased a quadruped robot named “Orion” during an interview at the prestigious summit. Clad in university branding, the robot was presented in a manner that led many to believe it was an indigenous creation from the university’s Centre of Excellence.
However, the tech community on social media was quick to debunk these claims. Sharp-eyed observers identified the machine as a “Unitree Go2,” a commercially available robotic dog manufactured by the Chinese firm Unitree Robotics. The disconnect between the presentation and the product’s actual origin sparked an immediate wave of criticism online.
The Fallout at India AI Impact Summit
As the video of the demonstration gathered momentum on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), the organizers of the India AI Impact Summit took decisive action. Reports indicate that Galgotias University was asked to vacate its stall at the venue. Furthermore, the power supply to their exhibit was disconnected on Wednesday as a direct consequence of the alleged misrepresentation.
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) maintained a stern stance on the matter. IT Secretary S. Krishnan emphasized that the government maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward exhibits that are falsely portrayed as original innovations. He noted that misleading the public and the tech community undermines the spirit of such high-level summits.
Galgotias University Responds to the Crisis
Following the public outcry, Galgotias University issued an official clarification to distance the institution from any intent to deceive. The university administration claimed that Neha Singh was “ill-informed” during her interaction with the media. They asserted that there was no “institutional intent” to misrepresent the Chinese robot as their own proprietary technology.
The university’s statement further reiterated its commitment to academic integrity and transparency. By vacating the premises promptly, the institution aimed to respect the sentiments of the organizers and the government bodies involved. However, the explanation did little to quiet the storm brewing on professional networking sites.
Neha Singh’s LinkedIn Status Sparks New Debate
Amidst the heated discussions, social media users noticed a significant change on Neha Singh’s LinkedIn profile. The Galgotias Rep Neha Singh’s “Open To Work” LinkedIn Pic Viral After Robot Row became a secondary talking point as a screenshot of her profile featuring the green “Open To Work” frame circulated widely.
This feature is typically used by professionals to signal to recruiters that they are actively seeking new employment opportunities. The timing of this profile update, occurring simultaneously with the robot controversy, led to intense speculation regarding her future tenure at Galgotias University. Interestingly, by Thursday afternoon, the “Open To Work” frame had been removed from her profile.
Neha Singh Offers Clarification
Breaking her silence on the matter, Neha Singh spoke to reporters to clarify her stance. She argued that the entire situation was a result of a communication gap rather than a deliberate lie. “Your six can be my nine,” she remarked, suggesting that her words were misinterpreted due to the chaotic environment and noise at the summit.
Singh clarified that the university never officially claimed to have manufactured the robot. According to her, the intent was to use the cutting-edge Chinese technology as an educational tool to inspire students. She maintained that exposing students to such hardware is part of the university’s mission to build future leaders in the field of Artificial Intelligence.
Academic Integrity in the Age of AI
This incident has reopened a larger conversation about academic ethics and the pressure on private universities to project an image of high-tech innovation. Critics argue that while using third-party tools for education is standard practice, claiming ownership of global technology damages the credibility of the Indian startup and research ecosystem.
Industry experts suggest that educational institutions must be more rigorous in their public demonstrations. Using a “Unitree Go2” for research is commendable, but the branding and messaging surrounding such displays must clearly attribute the original manufacturers to avoid “innovation washing.”
To learn more, follow Shabdsanchi’s social media pages today and stay updated.
- Facebook: shabdsanchi
- Instagram: shabdsanchiofficial
- YouTube: @shabd_sanchi
- Twitter: shabdsanchi